Project

General

Profile

Referring to non-main repositories in comments

Added by Adham Abozaeid over 9 years ago

I have a project with two repositories defined (say repo_1 and repo_2). They both are connected and shows in the activity tab with no problems.
However, I can only refer to one of them in comments.
According to the text formatting guide http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormatting
i'm using

source:file_name

and it goes to !http://<my_server>/projects/<my_project>/repository/entry/file_name successfully

If I used

source:repo_2|file_name

it goes to !http://<my_server>/projects/<my_project>/repository/entry/repo_2%7Cfile_name
with 404 error "The entry or revision was not found in the repository."

Same happens when i try to refer to repo_1 like

source:repo_1|file_name

I can access repo_2 through URL
!http://<my_server>/projects/<my_project>/repository/repo_2/file_name
I thought it might be a problem of the "|" character that converts to "%7C" in the URl, so I tried

source:repo_2/file_name

which generated URL !http://<my_server>/projects/<my_project>/repository/entry/repo_2/file_name
but still gets 404 error. The only difference between this URL and the one that works (!http://<my_server>/projects/<my_project>/repository/repo_2/file_name) is the extra "entry/"

Am i missing something, or are the generated URLs not correct?

N.B. I'm usin redmine version 2.1.4 running on a windows server.


Replies (2)

RE: Referring to non-main repositories in comments - Added by Martin Denizet (redmine.org team member) over 9 years ago

Hello Adham,

I tested on the oldest Redmine instance I had around(1.4.3), it worked as expected with, for main repo:

source:init.rb

For the secondary repo:

source:secondary|init.rb

I've no idea what is to blame in your setup,

Cheers,

RE: Referring to non-main repositories in comments - Added by Adham Abozaeid over 9 years ago

Hi Martin

Thanks for your reply. maybe it's a problem with this specific version of redmine.
Can you send me the URL generated in both cases from the two comments you included in your example?

I think it's either that the text formatting generates a wrong URL, or the URL doesn't exist for some other reason

    (1-2/2)