https://www.redmine.org/https://www.redmine.org/favicon.ico?16793021292012-07-04T10:12:40ZRedmineRedmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=394512012-07-04T10:12:40ZMischa The Evil
<ul><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>Duplicate</i></li></ul><p>Looks like it's the same as <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-3 priority-lowest closed" title="Defect: Reordering priority-enumerations breaks alternate-theme's issue-colouring (Closed)" href="https://www.redmine.org/issues/2071">#2071</a>?</p> Redmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=394532012-07-04T10:27:54ZPeter Schuler
<ul></ul><p>Sorry, that ticket didn't came up in my searches.</p>
<p>The concept behind the issue is the same, however this one refers to <strong>status</strong> instead of <strong>priority</strong>. IMHO this is a little bit more serious with status, because status refers to an nominal scale and priority refers to an ordinal scale.</p>
<p>But I agree that a simple workaround is to use priority=ID so that it has low severity.</p> Redmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=394682012-07-04T19:32:17ZJean-Philippe Langjp_lang@yahoo.fr
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>2.1.0</i></li></ul><p>Agreed.</p> Redmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=399742012-07-26T16:51:05ZJean-Philippe Langjp_lang@yahoo.fr
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>UI</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Jean-Philippe Lang</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> changed from <i>Duplicate</i> to <i>Fixed</i></li></ul><p>Change done in <a class="changeset" title="Changed issues css class from status-{position} to status-{id} (#11304)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/10078">r10078</a>.</p> Redmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=733242016-09-06T14:38:40ZMichel Albert
<ul></ul><p>Jean-Philippe Lang wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change done in <a class="changeset" title="Changed issues css class from status-{position} to status-{id} (#11304)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/10078">r10078</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've just run into the same issue. Had a look at <a class="changeset" title="Changed issues css class from status-{position} to status-{id} (#11304)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/10078">r10078</a> and wonder if <code>priority</code> does not have the same issue?</p> Redmine - Defect #11304: Issue-class: status-1, status-2 etc. refer to status position instead of status idhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/11304?journal_id=733372016-09-07T00:11:12ZMischa The Evil
<ul></ul><p>Michel Albert wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[...] Had a look at <a class="changeset" title="Changed issues css class from status-{position} to status-{id} (#11304)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/10078">r10078</a> and wonder if <code>priority</code> does not have the same issue?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It had and it was fixed in a similar way in <a class="changeset" title="Changed issues css class from priority-{position} to status-{id} (#2071)." href="https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/repository/svn/revisions/10079">r10079</a> for <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-3 priority-lowest closed" title="Defect: Reordering priority-enumerations breaks alternate-theme's issue-colouring (Closed)" href="https://www.redmine.org/issues/2071">#2071</a> (note that the commit message contains a typo; read: priority-{id} instead of status-{id}).</p>