https://www.redmine.org/https://www.redmine.org/favicon.ico?16793021292013-01-20T18:11:47ZRedmineRedmine - Feature #12915: Display Category field back again if no categories are defined in project and user can create categorieshttps://www.redmine.org/issues/12915?journal_id=447472013-01-20T18:11:47ZJean-Philippe Langjp_lang@yahoo.fr
<ul></ul><blockquote>
<p>there is no more reason to hide the Category field if no categories are defined in the project</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If some projects don't use Categories but some other do, the field can not be disabled by the workflow setup.</p> Redmine - Feature #12915: Display Category field back again if no categories are defined in project and user can create categorieshttps://www.redmine.org/issues/12915?journal_id=447492013-01-20T18:35:09ZEtienne Massip
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>Wont fix</i></li></ul><p>Jean-Philippe Lang wrote:</p>
<blockquote><blockquote>
<p>there is no more reason to hide the Category field if no categories are defined in the project</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If some projects don't use Categories but some other do, the field can not be disabled by the workflow setup.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, that's why I didn't propose it as candidate. In some way this issue is related to those tasking the ability to (re?)define WF at project level.</p>
<p>We can close it for now, guess it' meaningless until such functionality is actually implemented.</p> Redmine - Feature #12915: Display Category field back again if no categories are defined in project and user can create categorieshttps://www.redmine.org/issues/12915?journal_id=449442013-01-25T11:08:21ZEtienne Massip
<ul></ul><p>Jean-Philippe Lang wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If some projects don't use Categories but some other do, the field can not be disabled by the workflow setup.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Category field is displayed empty after the issue has been created in a project which has no category defined, this is inconsistent?</p>