Project

General

Profile

Actions

Defect #19227

closed

Users.xml broken

Added by Jens Peter Kempkes almost 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
REST API
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Duplicate
Affected version:

Description

I put a request on users.xml.

User that logged in for the last time on redmine 2.1 get a xml-well-formated last_log_in timestamp. the users who logged in with redmine 2.6.0.stable (we recently upgraded) get a broken one.

Example of https://server/redmine/users.xml

<users total_count="34" offset="0" limit="25" type="array">
<user>
    <id>109</id>
    <login>some_forgotten_user</login>
    <firstname>Name</firstname>
    <lastname>Name</lastname>
    <mail>emailaddress</mail>
    <created_on>2013-06-18T09:16:21Z</created_on>      
    <last_login_on>2014-08-25T12:34:48Z</last_login_on>
</user>
<user>
<id>155</id>
    <login>a newly used user</login>
    <firstname>Name</firstname>
    <lastname>Name</lastname>
    <mail>emailaddres</mail>
    <created_on>2014-09-01 09:21:59 UTC</created_on>
    <last_login_on>2015-02-27 09:51:50 UTC</last_login_on>
</user>

User ID 155, last_login_on seems not to be xml well-formated. User 109 who did not log in since we applied the upgrade is still ok.

What's wrong?


Related issues

Is duplicate of Redmine - Defect #19065: API: issue details created_on timestamp not formatted as expectedClosedJean-Philippe Lang

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Needs feedback

I think it is fixed by #19065.

Actions #2

Updated by Jens Peter Kempkes almost 10 years ago

Wow. Superspeed Feedback.

Sorry. couldn't find this issue by the keywords I searched for.

Actions #3

Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs feedback to Closed
  • Resolution set to Duplicate

Yes, this is fixed in 2.6.2.

Actions #4

Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA almost 10 years ago

  • Is duplicate of Defect #19065: API: issue details created_on timestamp not formatted as expected added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF