https://www.redmine.org/https://www.redmine.org/favicon.ico?16793021292015-04-15T07:33:36ZRedmineRedmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=631302015-04-15T07:33:36ZToshi MARUYAMA
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Needs feedback</i></li></ul><p>I cannot reproduce on <a class="version" href="https://www.redmine.org/versions/91">2.6.3</a>.</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=640812015-06-08T21:30:27ZE Lipinsky
<ul></ul><p>Thanks for the response.</p>
<p>After testing more, including on 2.6.5 and 3.0.3, I see what happened. When I set the custom field state to Required in Workflow, I did not do it for enough roles. In the end it seems like I needed to apply the setting to all roles for it to work as expected.</p>
<p>Not sure whether there is some issue in how the roles interact, or maybe the documentation could explain it more(?)</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=640832015-06-09T03:30:58ZMischa The Evil
<ul></ul><p>E Lipinsky wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After testing more, including on 2.6.5 and 3.0.3, I see what happened. When I set the custom field state to Required in Workflow, I did not do it for enough roles. In the end it seems like I needed to apply the setting to all roles for it to work as expected.</p>
<p>Not sure whether there is some issue in how the roles interact, or maybe the documentation could explain it more(?)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You are probably testing this with a user account configured to be an <em>Administrator</em>. I've explained the expected behavior for this situation with references recently in <a class="message" href="https://www.redmine.org/boards/1/topics/47429?r=47438#message-47438">RE: Validation on issue tracker before closing an issue?</a>.<br />Another thing that might cause issues like this is that if a user has multiple roles on the same project, then only fields required/read-only for <strong>all</strong> its roles are actually required/read-only.</p>
<p>Hope this helps, Mischa.</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=640992015-06-09T18:16:55ZE Lipinsky
<ul></ul><p>Thanks Mischa, that does help. I think it was a combination of the Administrator and multiple role scenarios.</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=641052015-06-10T04:13:07ZMischa The Evil
<ul></ul><p>E Lipinsky wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Thanks Mischa, that does help. I think it was a combination of the Administrator and multiple role scenarios.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I see. So this issue can be closed as it is the current expected behavior?</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=641172015-06-10T17:50:47ZE Lipinsky
<ul></ul><p>Mischa The Evil wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I see. So this issue can be closed as it is the current expected behavior?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok, sure. Thanks.</p> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=641202015-06-11T03:49:44ZMischa The Evil
<ul><li><strong>Is duplicate of</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-1 priority-4 priority-default" href="/issues/11887">Defect #11887</a>: Issue permission doesn't apply to Administrators</i> added</li></ul> Redmine - Defect #19417: status change is allowed with empty workflow-required custom fieldhttps://www.redmine.org/issues/19417?journal_id=641222015-06-11T03:50:55ZMischa The Evil
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Needs feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>Duplicate</i></li></ul>