Project

General

Profile

Forums » Open discussion »

Redmine+Subversion really slow :-(

Added by Tilo Riemer about 12 years ago

Hi,

I have just upgraded to Redmine 2.0.2 using the Bitnami stack. And I tried to get running the Subversion integration again. The first attempt failed one year ago...

But even if I point at the last directory in a repository tree with only 4 files it takes a lot of time to show the "Repository" page. And all other page requests are locked until the Repository page has been shown. So it's impossible to work with Redmine.

A lot of time means about 65 seconds in this case of a directory with 4 files.
If I try to fetch a deeper repository tree it needs one hour or more for the first fetching. But reloading of the Repository page needs still some minutes.

I have played with the settings but I could not find a working configuration.

Then I tried your repository. And it is really fast. I guess Redmine uses Subversion as SCM. So what is the difference?

Our configuration:

Redmine 2.0.2 (Bitnami stack)
Windows Server 2008
Host: VM with 2xXeon (3.5 GHz) and 4 GB RAM
MySQL 5.5 with InnoDB --> Is this the problem?
SVN 1.7 running via Apache 2.2 and SSL (access to repository works after some googling for the right svn parameters)
The SVN server is running on another host but connected via 1GBit LAN. Is that a problem?

I have used Redmine together with CVS some years ago. And I'm eager to enjoy an integrated SCM. So I hope anyone can help me.

Thanks in Advance.
Tilo Riemer


Replies (1)

RE: Redmine+Subversion really slow :-( - Added by Ivan Cenov about 12 years ago

I've just tested our Redmine+SVN speed:

I have test installation on my laptop, at home, and use our production database, uploaded in a MySQL server that is running on the same laptop. SVN is on the server at the office. I have VPN with our office.

So, I am running the test installation at home and it is able to see the repositories at the office without delays. This make me think that Redmine is OK and does not make delays. I suspect that there is something in your network configurations...

    (1-1/1)