Project

General

Profile

Sidekiq and windows

Added by Steve Zhou 2 months ago

Because the experience of Sidekiq under windows was not good, it had to be abandoned.
If you have any good ideas, please leave your precious comments.


Replies (1)

RE: Sidekiq and windows - Added by Alison Quintana 2 months ago

Sidekiq's performance and compatibility issues under Windows are indeed a common challenge, as it's designed to run primarily on Unix-based systems. Here are a few alternative approaches you might consider:

1. Running Sidekiq on WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux)
Pros: You can run a lightweight Linux environment inside Windows, making Sidekiq more compatible. WSL2 provides better performance than the original WSL, allowing you to run Sidekiq as if on a native Linux system.
Cons: Additional setup and configuration are required, and there may still be some occasional compatibility hiccups.
2. Docker
Pros:
Cons: Requires familiarity with Docker and managing container environments.
3. Cloud-based Sidekiq
Pros : I
Cons:
4. Alternatives to Sidekiq
And then:
Delayed Job: Doesn't rely on Redis and works directly with your database, making it more lightweight for smaller use cases, although it may not be as performant as Sidekiq for high-throughput environments.
5. Remote Linux Server for Sidekiq
Pros : I
Cons: This requires server management and may increase development complexity with remote job handling.
Would any of these approaches fit your needs?

    (1-1/1)