Feature #11276
Missing related issues "regressed" and "regressed by" (for experts scenario)
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | Issues | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Resolution: | Duplicate |
Description
Into "related issues" section today missing "regressed" and "regressed by" to define an issue that is the cause of a malfunction into an old already tested feature.
This is helpful into various scenario to retrieve and notify some developer mistake into a small\large team.
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by William Roush almost 10 years ago
Duplicate of #7849, custom relation types would provide this.
#2
Updated by pasquale [:dedalus] almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
William Roush wrote:
Duplicate of #7849, custom relation types would provide this.
I agree too: we can close this as duplicate
#3
Updated by Etienne Massip almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Resolution set to Duplicate