Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Feature #1139

closed

Being able to sort the issue list by custom fields

Added by Paolo Sulprizio over 16 years ago. Updated about 15 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Jean-Philippe Lang
Category:
Custom fields
Target version:
0.9.0
Start date:
2008-04-29
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Fixed

Description

Issue list is sortable only by standard fields. It should be useful being able to sort the issue list by custom fields.

Files

redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff (3.55 KB) redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff Jm Delehaye, 2009-05-26 18:55

Related issues

Related to Redmine - Defect #5778: Defect in the filters (custom field) from the list of issueClosedJean-Baptiste Barth2010-06-28

Actions
Related to Redmine - Defect #11073: UserCustomField order_statement returns wrong outputClosedEtienne Massip

Actions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Patrick Oppenlander over 16 years ago

+1 !!

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by yo perollet over 16 years ago

That's wright, it would be very useful to be able to sort the issue by custom fields

I'm very interested in this function

Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Curtis Stewart over 16 years ago

I just had a request from one of my customers to be able to sort by the custom fields also.
+1

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Richard Nichols over 16 years ago

+1, this is a feature requested while evaluating whether to implement Redmine in our organisation.

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Brian Lopez about 16 years ago

+1
We'd really like to have this feature. We use a "ranking" custom field that works similarly to a priority, but is more like an order of assumed completion.
Currently we have to keep exporting to excel, and sort there.

Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Nick Bolton about 16 years ago

+1
We use a similar custom field for sorting order that prioritized tasks should be completed.

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Vasia Pupkin almost 16 years ago

+1

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by sunday walker almost 16 years ago

+1

ex.
Add the "severity" to the custom field.
I want sort by "severity".

Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 16 years ago

  • Category set to Custom fields
  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Target version set to 0.9.0
  • Resolution set to Fixed

Done in r2257 and r2258.

Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Jm Delehaye over 15 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened
  • Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Mark P over 15 years ago

Is there any way to get this functionality in 0.8.3? I created a Unified DIFF from revision 2258, but it hung and did nothing when I tried to apply that patch to my 0.8.3 install. I suspect I am doing something incorrectly as I don't patch very often. Any ideas or direction would be very helpful.

Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Jm Delehaye over 15 years ago

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Nikolay Kotlyarov over 15 years ago

+1
Very useful feature.

Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by VM Weseloh about 15 years ago

+1
A must have for us

Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by harald fürthauer about 15 years ago

+1
would be also for us a very usful feature!

Actions
Copy link
 #16

Updated by harald fürthauer about 15 years ago

Jm Delehaye wrote:

This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.

Is this patch also working with 0.8.4

Actions
Copy link
 #17

Updated by Matthew Baker about 15 years ago

I am running 0.8.5 and this fix brings up a GET/redmine error when I implement it. I even reverted back to 0.8.3 and I got the same thing.

Actions
Copy link
 #18

Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 15 years ago

  • Status changed from Reopened to Closed

Jm Delehaye wrote:

Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.

Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?

No, it won't be merged to 0.8.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF