Feature #1139
closed
Being able to sort the issue list by custom fields
Added by Paolo Sulprizio about 16 years ago. Updated over 14 years ago.
0%
Description
Issue list is sortable only by standard fields. It should be useful being able to sort the issue list by custom fields.
Files
| redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff (3.55 KB) redmine_sortByCf_changeset_r2257.diff | Jm Delehaye, 2009-05-26 18:55 |
Related issues
Updated by
Updated by yo perollet almost 16 years ago
That's wright, it would be very useful to be able to sort the issue by custom fields
I'm very interested in this function
Updated by Curtis Stewart almost 16 years ago
I just had a request from one of my customers to be able to sort by the custom fields also.
+1
Updated by Richard Nichols over 15 years ago
+1, this is a feature requested while evaluating whether to implement Redmine in our organisation.
Updated by Brian Lopez over 15 years ago
+1
We'd really like to have this feature. We use a "ranking" custom field that works similarly to a priority, but is more like an order of assumed completion.
Currently we have to keep exporting to excel, and sort there.
Updated by Nick Bolton over 15 years ago
+1
We use a similar custom field for sorting order that prioritized tasks should be completed.
Updated by
Updated by sunday walker over 15 years ago
+1
ex.
Add the "severity" to the custom field.
I want sort by "severity".
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 15 years ago
- Category set to Custom fields
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Target version set to 0.9.0
- Resolution set to Fixed
Updated by Jm Delehaye about 15 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Reopened
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.
Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?
Updated by Mark P almost 15 years ago
Is there any way to get this functionality in 0.8.3? I created a Unified DIFF from revision 2258, but it hung and did nothing when I tried to apply that patch to my 0.8.3 install. I suspect I am doing something incorrectly as I don't patch very often. Any ideas or direction would be very helpful.
Updated by Jm Delehaye almost 15 years ago
This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.
Updated by 
Updated by
Updated by harald fürthauer over 14 years ago
+1
would be also for us a very usful feature!
Updated by harald fürthauer over 14 years ago
Jm Delehaye wrote:
This patch seems to be OK on 0.8.3.
Is this patch also working with 0.8.4
Updated by Matthew Baker over 14 years ago
I am running 0.8.5 and this fix brings up a GET/redmine error when I implement it. I even reverted back to 0.8.3 and I got the same thing.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 14 years ago
- Status changed from Reopened to Closed
Jm Delehaye wrote:
Very nice feature.
Thanks Jean-Philippe.Is it possible to merge to 0.8 ?
No, it won't be merged to 0.8.