Feature #1432
closedAdd "follows" issue relation
0%
Description
To relate issues, I have the possibility to choose "precedes", which is very nice. However, most of the times I'm adding a bug that follows another issue. To define the relation, I need to return to the first issue adding the relation there. I'd like to have the possibility to add the relation "follows" from the newest bug also, this saves me some time clicking and searching.
Files
Updated by Thomas Capricelli about 16 years ago
+10 for this one.
I dont know how this is implemented, but probably there's a model 'relation' with a key to both issues being in relation. If so, it is really easy to add a "follows" in the menu popup, that will just created a 'precedes' by inversing the two issues.
As Jonas, almost all the time when i need such a relation is when i create the second issue, and i want to say it should only be adressed after another one. My current way of doing is to 'remember' the number of the new one, go to the other one and add a relation "precedes" .. which is both tedious and dangerous (i have a very very bad short term memory)
Updated by Curtis Stewart about 16 years ago
+ 1
I find myself have the same problems as Thomas, (including the short term memory).
I was wondering if the implementation could be on the issues page. This would take two parts
1. Use the right click and be able to perform the relationships.
2. The second part would be to be able to display and sort by relationship.
This would alow us to go through all of the tasks and do the first shot as scheduling on the page that has all of the tasks.
Updated by Josh Galvez almost 16 years ago
Just another +1 on this. It is an important time saving feature for us.
Updated by Anonymous about 15 years ago
Please review my patch. I believe it resolves this issue.
Updated by Josh Galvez about 15 years ago
Krzysztof Podejma there seems to be a lot unrelated changes in this patch. Why is that?
Updated by Anonymous about 15 years ago
Sorry, I had a strange problem with my svn working copy. I'm uploading once again.
Updated by Josh Galvez about 15 years ago
Krzysztof Podejma wrote:
Sorry, I had a strange problem with my svn working copy. I'm uploading once again.
Thank you! This patch works great for me.
Updated by Anonymous about 15 years ago
I'm happy it helps you.
Is it possible to apply my patch to the trunk?
Regards
Krzysztof Podejma
Updated by Josh Galvez about 15 years ago
This is just a bump so it shows up in activity. This patch is good and ready for the trunk!
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 15 years ago
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
Updated by Mischa The Evil about 15 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to New
- Priority changed from Low to Normal
+1 from me too...
Updated by Josh Galvez about 15 years ago
Eric says the only thing holding this patch back is people to push for it. But more particularly unit tests for the Issue Relation Model, see #4438. Any up to coding those tests?
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 15 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Target version set to 0.9.0
- Resolution set to Fixed
Feature added in r3190.