Defect #14796
closedYard rake file is not updated for Redmine 2.x
0%
Description
- yard is parsing test files of core plugins, while it shouldn't
- yard is not parsing regular files of third-party plugins, while it should
The first issue is being caused by source:/trunk/lib/tasks/yardoc.rake#L5 which adds lib/**/*.rb to files
. After r9533 Rails plugins required by the core are located in lib/plugins instead of vendor/plugins, so they are now going to be parsed by yard already through source:/trunk/lib/tasks/yardoc.rake#L5, instead of being added through source:/trunk/lib/tasks/yardoc.rake#L6 which does have the exclusion regex for test files.
The second issue is being caused by source:/trunk/lib/tasks/yardoc.rake#L6 which is still expecting plugins to reside in vendor/plugins instead of plugins (pre r9503).
The following patch should fix both of the above mentioned issues:
Index: lib/tasks/yardoc.rake
===================================================================
--- lib/tasks/yardoc.rake (revision 12119)
+++ lib/tasks/yardoc.rake (working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
require 'yard'
YARD::Rake::YardocTask.new do |t|
- files = ['lib/**/*.rb', 'app/**/*.rb']
- files << Dir['vendor/plugins/**/*.rb'].reject {|f| f.match(/test/) } # Exclude test files
+ files = ['app/**/*.rb']
+ # Exclude test files
+ files << Dir['lib/**/*.rb'].reject {|f| f.match(/test/) }
+ files << Dir['plugins/**/*.rb'].reject {|f| f.match(/test/) }
t.files = files
static_files = ['doc/CHANGELOG',
Note: this patch will also make yard to exclude test files under other directories in lib besides lib/plugins, but:
- quick-scan: there are none...
- if there will be some it doesn't really matter in my opinion, because test files should not be parsed by yard in general (read: while being invoked using the rake file that is provided by Redmine)
Updated by Mischa The Evil over 10 years ago
- Assignee set to Jean-Baptiste Barth
@Jean-Baptiste:
Nice to see you are merging-in some patches ;) Can you maybe take a look at this patch also? It seems to me a small change, which doesn't break anything...
Thanks in advance, Mischa.
Edit: below a more concise iteration of the patch, rebased on current trunk (r13364):
Updated by Jean-Baptiste Barth over 10 years ago
- Status changed from Needs feedback to Closed
- Target version set to 2.5.3
- Resolution set to Fixed
No problem Mischa, done in r13365/r13366. I removed the comment which was trivial imho. Thanks!