Defect #19516
closedIssue "preceeds" error: If B follows A, B starting date !=< ending date of A, should be Bs !< Ae
0%
Description
It is perfectly logical and reasonable to plan to start issue B the same day issue A is resolved. There's no reason to enforce in planning a "A's done! Everybody go home early!" rule. It should be entirely practical to plan to resolve 100 sequential issues on a single day, though perhaps a bit optimistic even just for the overhead of closing them out.
Somewhat more ambitiously, one could argue that the end should not be fewer days after the start than the total anticipated hours / number of people assigned / whichever is less (hours planned to work | 24 hours per day).
Related issues
Updated by David Gessel over 9 years ago
This is to spec, but I think this is over contrained.... [[http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineIssues#Related-issues]]
Updated by Go MAEDA over 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Duplicate
Duplicate of #3195 and discussions are going on there.
Thanks for reporting.
Updated by Go MAEDA over 9 years ago
- Is duplicate of Patch #3195: issue's start date could be the latest due date of predecessors added