Project

General

Profile

Actions

Defect #19516

closed

Issue "preceeds" error: If B follows A, B starting date !=< ending date of A, should be Bs !< Ae

Added by David Gessel over 9 years ago. Updated over 9 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Issues planning
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Duplicate
Affected version:

Description

It is perfectly logical and reasonable to plan to start issue B the same day issue A is resolved. There's no reason to enforce in planning a "A's done! Everybody go home early!" rule. It should be entirely practical to plan to resolve 100 sequential issues on a single day, though perhaps a bit optimistic even just for the overhead of closing them out.

Somewhat more ambitiously, one could argue that the end should not be fewer days after the start than the total anticipated hours / number of people assigned / whichever is less (hours planned to work | 24 hours per day).


Related issues

Is duplicate of Redmine - Patch #3195: issue's start date could be the latest due date of predecessorsNew2009-04-17

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by David Gessel over 9 years ago

This is to spec, but I think this is over contrained.... [[http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineIssues#Related-issues]]

Actions #2

Updated by Go MAEDA over 9 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Resolution set to Duplicate

Duplicate of #3195 and discussions are going on there.
Thanks for reporting.

Actions #3

Updated by Go MAEDA over 9 years ago

  • Is duplicate of Patch #3195: issue's start date could be the latest due date of predecessors added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF