Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Patch #33367

closed

Use more efficient "exists?" instead of "first" in tests when checking the existence of rows

Added by Go MAEDA about 5 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Go MAEDA
Category:
Code cleanup/refactoring
Target version:
4.2.0
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

When you check if any row exists, using exists? that does not return ActiveRecord objects is more efficient than using first.

The attached patch replaces first with exists?.

Files

use-exists-instead-of-first.patch (6.67 KB) use-exists-instead-of-first.patch Go MAEDA, 2020-04-29 11:03
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Go MAEDA about 5 years ago

  • Subject changed from Use more efficient "exists?" instead of "first” in tests when checking the existence of rows to Use more efficient "exists?" instead of "first" in tests when checking the existence of rows
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Go MAEDA about 5 years ago

  • Target version set to 4.2.0

Setting the target version to 4.2.0.

Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Go MAEDA about 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Assignee set to Go MAEDA

Committed the patch.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF