Defect #7639
Some date fields do not have requested format.
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2011-02-17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | UI | |||
| Target version: | 1.2.0 | |||
| Resolution: | Fixed | Affected version: | 1.1.0 |
Description
As project administrator - set the date format to 17/02/2011 i.e. 17 February 2011.
- In Issues tabs (as normal user) the "Updated" field shows dates with format 02/17/2011.
- As admin user checking the Users - the creation date also shows dates as 04/28/2010
In Issues tab if displaying the start date and due date then they are in the correct format.
Related issues
Associated revisions
Fixed: date part of the time default format doesn't respect the date format (#7639).
History
#1
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Fixed
Fixed in r4894.
#2
Updated by Tony Maher over 10 years ago
Thanks for the quick resolution.
#3
Updated by Etienne Massip over 10 years ago
- Target version set to 1.2.0
#4
Updated by Max Khon over 10 years ago
The fix also fixes more serious problem: format_date(time) was called before this patch instead of format_date(local). This leads to incorrect displaying of dates (e.g. when timezone is specified or time is in UTC).
E.g. if the timestamp is 14 Apr 03:40am GMT+7 and user timezone is set to UTC, 14 Apr 20:40pm instead of 13 Apr 20:40pm is displayed.
Should there be a backport to 1.1 branch?