Defect #10048
open
Secondary sorting after sorting by parent task
0%
Description
I've created a custom query with two sort orders: 1) Parent task - Ascending (as I want my subtasks be grouped visually together), 2) Updated - Descending (as I want to see the most recently changed tasks at the top).
What I would expect is that- all the tasks without parents would be sorted by their "Updated" value;
- all the subtasks within the same parent task would be sorted by their "Updated" value.
As can be seen in the attached screenshot, the actual result in the example of "http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/issues" is all the non-parent tasks sorted by their IDs.
All the versions to be submitted along with a bug reports, please take from the current http://www.redmine.org installation, where I'm submitting the defect in. The test screenshot is taken from here.
Files
Related issues
Updated by Philip Reinders almost 13 years ago
I am seeing the same problem. Sort of curious what is going on with this one as it is fairly critical for my implementation.
Updated by Vitaly Klimov almost 13 years ago
Please check my plugin - it solves this behavior:
Updated by Asaf H about 12 years ago
+1
We have the same issue. It's problematic as I want to sort issues by priorities, but still have the subtasks grouped under their parent.
Updated by John Pisani almost 12 years ago
+1
Parent, Priority just ignores the latter.
Updated by Dipan Mehta almost 12 years ago
+1. This is indeed very essential to be in Redmine.
Updated by
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 11 years ago
- Has duplicate Defect #14432: Sorting issues with subtasks added
Updated by
Updated by Zdravko Balorda about 11 years ago
Any news on this?
redmine_smart_issues_sort wouldn't run on 2.3, saying:
undefined method 'issues' for class 'Query'
on line 12 lib/query_patch.rb
Any clues are most appreciated.
Zdravko
Updated by Nicolas Ph almost 11 years ago
Well, i have the same issue, a custom query with "Parent task" as first sort field, the second field is ignored, whatever it is. The result look like the second field is set to 'Created'.
The same issue exists when sorting issue by clicking on columns : After adding the 'Parent Task' to the issue view, I click on "Updated" for example, and then on 'Parent Task', the previous 'Updated' order is completely lost.
By the way, the gantt view with the same query seems to work right.
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 9 years ago
- Has duplicate Defect #20123: Can't sort by multiple fields when sorting by parent added
Updated by Matt Brooke about 9 years ago
+1 causing us a problem and the patch doesn't seem compatible with v 3.1
Updated by Sebastian Paluch about 9 years ago
+100
I'm getting more and more complains about this. We have thousands of issues per project organized in a tree structure and this defect is very, very painful.
Updated by Josh Gitlin almost 8 years ago
+1, having the same issue, same use case. I would think this should be a simple fix... but I haven't looked at the code
Updated by
Updated by pizfantast pizfantast almost 5 years ago
+1
plugins and patches no longer work
Updated by Go MAEDA about 4 years ago
- Has duplicate Defect #31840: Sort by Parent does not work as expected added
Updated by Ribald Drobens almost 4 years ago
Confirmed here as well; when 1st ordering is for parent issue, ties (i.e. no parent or same parent) are not resolved using any following filter which makes tree-like views practically impossible.
Updated by Go MAEDA almost 4 years ago
- Has duplicate Defect #34818: Do not display in the order set in the custom query! added
Updated by
Updated by Sofie vdm about 3 years ago
+1
This is problematic, the secondary sort would be really useful, while still maintaining the parent structure.
Updated by txemi M almost 3 years ago
In case it is useful for anyone else.
After waiting for this to be implemented I finally made my own solution.
You can find it here:
https://github.com/txemi/redmine_sorted_tree
It is an small development that creates an extra index that you can use to get hierarchical tree and allows use aditional sorting criterias for deep issues in tree.
It helps me to get human reports sorting issue tree as I want.
Updated by Go MAEDA 11 months ago
- Has duplicate Defect #38618: it seems to be sorted by issue number instead of parent issue number. After that, setting the sort order has no effect at custom query added