Feature #10927
closed
Add a filter on the "Issues" page to hide subtasks
Added by Nicolas Jolet over 12 years ago.
Updated over 9 years ago.
Description
I would find useful to add a filter to hide subtasks in the issue list.
This could help to limit the issue list size, specially if you use subtasks a lot.
This could be also interesting to add a marker that indicates that a task has subtasks.
What you need here would be "AND ParentTask IS NULL" as one of the filter options - currently although you can display the parentTask column, you cant filter on it.
I believe these are related tasks: #10553, #10559
Maybe related: #9992 (could be resolved with AND ParentTask = <someID> filter)
Yes, it will be great! If I'm goint to set priorities for tasks and set sorting by priority I can't see which tasks are the subtasks and which are not. I think priorities are significant only on the same nesting level not across nesting levels. But now I can set priority in such way:
- task 1 (high)
- task 2 (low)
- subtask 1 (urgent)
- subtask 2 (critical)
- task 3 (urgent)
And I have some ambiguity:
I need to work on tasks in such order
- subtask 2
- task 3
- subtask 1
- task 1
- priority for task 2 is not significant!
or in such order
I think the second will be correct. That is priority takes place only for items in group!
May be it depends on used workflow.
If I want to fix some subissue while the parent issue has low priority or is blocked I can simply move this subissue to another parent issue or to move it one level up.
What do you think about it?
- Category set to Issues planning
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Duplicate
This one could be closed as duplicate of #9992.
+1 This would be a very useful feature.
Also, this is not a duplicate, although #9992 could be used as a means of achieving this. I suggest this be changed to related to or depends on.
Bryn Jeffries wrote:
+1 This would be a very useful feature.
Also, this is not a duplicate, although #9992 could be used as a means of achieving this. I suggest this be changed to related to or depends on.
See #9992#note-8.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA