Redmine

It is indeed technically feasible, but could you please elaborate on "Textile is [snip] not powerful enough" so that we know exactly what is lacking.

Also duplicate of #1208

James: I'll try to search more thoroughly next time.

Paul:

  Place you code here.

Textile is a way to write HTML more effective way.

ReST is a way to write plain text that is parseable but also looking "formatted" in plain text view. That is probably why it's standard Python way of writing documentation and that's why nearly every single colleague of mine who is a Python developer asked me about ReST support after Trac2Redmine migration.

As I read through other textile/wiki formatting threads and issues here, I suppose more (and good enough) would be support for different formatting in Trac way (marking block of differently formatted with start and end sequence). Much bigger problem seems to be what James wrote in #1208 about non-existence of Ruby parser for ReST.

Daniel Srb wrote:

[...]

oops i forgot something there... please ignore the code . )