Feature #3090
field "Assigned to" with roles
| Status: | New | Start date: | 2009-04-01 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Resolution: |
Description
Can it be that the field "Assigned to" was adjested with blinding to roles?
History
#1
Updated by Ivan Nik over 12 years ago
- Assignee set to Azamat Hackimov
#2
Updated by Ivan Nik over 12 years ago
- Assignee changed from Azamat Hackimov to Eric Davis
hei!
Is any-body monitoring issues?
#3
Updated by Thomas Pihl over 12 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Eric Davis)
Yes, alot of us read the issues. This issue looka like a dupe for a few other, and are an issue that have had alot of discussions. That said, feature requests doesnt automagicly get fixed. Assigning it to some developer isnt really the right way to get it done either.
If you need something developed, make a bounty or contact some consultant who can make changes specific to your needs and reqs (depending on your timeframe).
#4
Updated by Ivan Nik over 12 years ago
Thanks for the explanation
Updated by