Forums » Development »
Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
Added by Eric Davis about 14 years ago
I was thinking about adding a Wishlist version that we can use to track the bigger features that we'd like to see implemented. Then we can use these to show that the contributors agree that a feature should be implemented, but it needs someone to champion it before it can be included in a release. These can also be used to plan for the major releases.
Example of features that would be wishlisted (or could have been):
- Subtasks
- REST API
- Sub-projects
- Project level permissions
- Files/Documents merge
Thoughts? Good idea? Bad idea?
Eric Davis
Replies (5)
RE: Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
-
Added by Jean-Baptiste Barth about 14 years ago
Good idea. I think we should have a clear vision of what contributors think we should improve, it would help us focus on issues we should work on. Puppet guys have an "unplanned" version for that iirc.
RE: Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
-
Added by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago
+1, though unplanned sounds better than wishlist.
RE: Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
-
Added by Eric Davis about 14 years ago
"Unplanned" is a lot better. We now have a new version :)
http://www.redmine.org/versions/show/23
Eric Davis
RE: Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
-
Added by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago
/me dumps 98% of all open feature requests into that version
RE: Thoughts on a "Wishlist" version
-
Added by SEO wurfel over 5 years ago
Smart thought. I figure we ought to have an unmistakable vision of what benefactors figure we ought to enhance, it would enable us to concentrate on issues we should take a shot at. Manikin folks have a "spontaneous" variant