Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #10331

open

Per-project 'Issue Closed' status customization

Added by Kean Stump over 12 years ago. Updated almost 12 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Issues workflow
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:

Description

We are getting internal requests for the ability to set the various issue statuses (states, statii?) that map into 'Issue Closed' on a per-project basis.

Currently the issue statuses mapping affects all projects in the redmine instance. Our development projects have different status models, and this change would allow developers to use the status model that fits their workflow.

Example:

Project A would like the following:

Status      Default value    Issue closed
New              X
Assigned
Resolved                     X
Feedback
Closed                       X
Rejected                     X

Project B would like the following:

Status      Default value    Issue closed
New              X
Assigned
Resolved
Feedback
Closed                       X
Rejected                     X

I've looked through the feature requests and plugins and haven't seen anything that enables this. Enlightenment requested if I'm blind.


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Feature #973: Assign different status sets and workflows for separate projectsNew2008-04-02

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Terence Mill over 12 years ago

+1

Actions #2

Updated by Etienne Massip over 12 years ago

  • Category set to Issues workflow
Actions #3

Updated by Joshua Stein over 12 years ago

+1

Actions #4

Updated by Terence Mill over 12 years ago

sorry, but i set my +1 wrong.
It doesn't make sense to have close status per project but per tracker. At the moment you can define workflow per tracker but only one start and end state for all trackers.
+1 for optionally own start and end state per tracker not per project

Actions #5

Updated by Daniel Felix almost 12 years ago

This relates to #973.
Maybe it could be closed as duplicate? If the whole functionality of #973 getting implemented, he should be able to implement this!

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF