Redmine

Ah, I see. I had read somewhere that the syntax for linking to internal objects was Redmine-specific, so I assume that meant independant of wiki syntax. (For example, the syntax for inlining an external image still works the same after the changeover.)

I just tested it to confirm this, and it's working. Thanks!

Yes, internal linking syntax does not depend on text formatting setting. The documentation should explain that.
Thanks for your feedback.

Hi @Go MAEDA, I can see this syntax help link within the official redmine issue editor. But there's no link in my own deploy. Is this link only available in the official site?

dezhi xiong wrote:

Hi @Go MAEDA, I can see this syntax help link within the official redmine issue editor. But there's no link in my own deploy. Is this link only available in the official site?

Markdown help will be available in Redmine 3.1.0 (not yet released). Please wait 3.1.0 or consider overwriting public/help/*/wiki_syntax.html and public/help/*/wiki_syntax_detailed.html on your installation with wiki_syntax_md.html and wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html.

In the discussion starting with http://www.redmine.org/issues/15520#note-11 there was a revelation of Redmine having a special Markdown flavour, not standard Markdown. This should be visibly emphasized at the beginning of the documentation and in the settings, the name shouldn't be Markdown any more, but rather Redmine Markdown indicating it's a non-standard Markdown/CommonMark flavour.

Also if you really decide in the end, that HTML will be disabled, this should be also emphasized in the Redmine Markdown help, because it's another major divergence from the standard Markdown/CommonMark.

dumb blob, this issue and #15520 are closed.
It would be better to create a new issue if you want to discuss support of inline HTML.

Could you update http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown page, too?

For Markdown formatting see #15520, #16373 and #21443.

#20497 should be added. Or as dumb blob wrote, adding

Currently HTML is disabled. See #20497 for details.

may be better.

Hiroo Hayashi wrote:

Could you update http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown page, too?

You can edit it.

Maruyama-san,

You can edit it.

Yes, I can.

But I only have wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html. I think it must be generated from a Textile source code.
If you send it to me, I am glad to replace http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown page with it.

Thank you.

Hiroo Hayashi wrote:

Maruyama-san,

You can edit it.

Yes, I can.

But I only have wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html. I think it must be generated from a Textile source code.
If you send it to me,

What do you mean?

But I only have wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html. I think it must be generated from a Textile source code.
If you send it to me, I am glad to replace http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown page with it.

What do you mean?

We need a Textile source code (text) to update http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown which is written in Textile.
Without the textile text I have to convert wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html written in HTML to Textile.

I hope this makes sense for you.

I don't know RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown status.
If you think it is not synced with source:trunk/public/help/en/wiki_syntax_detailed_markdown.html@15715 ,
You can edit it manually.

Maruyama-san,

If you think it is not synced with source:trunk/public/help/en/wiki_syntax_detailed_markdown.html@15715 ,

It is not sync-ed at a glance.

But I understand the situation by checking history of source:trunk/public/help/en/wiki_syntax_detailed_markdown.html.

I thought Maeda-san attached wiki_syntax_detailed_md.html which was converted from textile.
But you are maintaining the two same contents separately.

I'll try to sync the wiki page with the HTML. Give me some time.

I'll try to sync the wiki page with the HTML. Give me some time.

Before doing this, I've found we have to sync source:trunk/public/help/en/wiki_syntax_detailed_textile.html with RedmineTextFormattingTextile.

As far as I took a look, RedmineTextFormattingTextile is most maintained. I am going to use RedmineTextFormattingTextile as a master file.
I will sync the Textile helps first. Then I will sync the Markdown helps with the Textile helps.

I've updated RedmineTextFormattingTextile first. Please double-check.

• changes to be more consistent. (displays, Display, Displays -> displays, etc.)
• merge some lines which were only in source:trunk/public/help/en/wiki_syntax_detailed_textile.html

The section Redmine Links is common to RedmineTextFormattingTextile and RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown (according to the current documents. I have not test most of them in Markdown mode.)
So I'd like to propose the following change to sync each other. Do you see any concern or problem?

• create a wiki page RedmineTextFormattingRedmineLinks.
• Move the section "Redmine Links" into the new wiki page.
• let RedmineTextFormattingTextile and RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown include the new wiki page

So I'd like to propose the following change to sync each other. Do you see any concern or problem?

• create a wiki page RedmineTextFormattingRedmineLinks.
• Move the section "Redmine Links" into the new wiki page.
• let RedmineTextFormattingTextile and RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown include the new wiki page

I've made these changes.

I've updated RedmineTextFormattingTextile and RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown.

RedmineTextFormattingTextile¶

• Rename the section "Predefined" to "Preformatted Text"
• Add preformatted texts to the section "Paragraphs".

http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingTextile/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&version=5&version_from=4&commit=%E5%B7%AE%E5%88%86%E3%82%92%E8%A6%8B%E3%82%8B

RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown¶

• sync with RedmineTextFormattingTextile

http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineTextFormattingMarkdown/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&version=17&version_from=16&commit=%E5%B7%AE%E5%88%86%E3%82%92%E8%A6%8B%E3%82%8B

Please double check.

This issue is closed. Please create a new issue for a new topic.

This issue is closed. Please create a new issue for a new topic.

I've opened #23413.