Feature #1936
open
Moving tasks between versions on the roadmap screen
Added by Marcin Kasperski about 16 years ago.
Updated over 11 years ago.
Description
It would be nice if one could move tasks between versions on the roadmap screen (using some Ajax - be it drag&drop or right-click/Version or anything else).
Rationale: roadmap is a great view of the project plan and it would be natural to perform this kind of management there.
Extra note: I am not using Gantt personally, but maybe sth similar could also make sense there.
This is actually a duplicate of #1770, although I can't actually set that. I'm also interested in this, and will probably submit a patch adding this functionality (along with some other roadmap issue stuff) in the near future.
While this is not done exactly you are describing, however something quite close to that is possible.
When the issues are listed (as items in table) in roadmap, you can select (multiple of) them and right click. It allow all bulk edit the issue. This includes setting the target version! Which mean you can move move around the issue between versions without moving out of roadmap page!
Though, I agree that drag-n-drop would be more intuitive.
I would agree that this would be a great addition and would improve the versionmanagement.
Maybe a bit bigger solution would be a planning board view for the roadmap where even unassigned issues were available and could be selected and arranged within the different available versions.
Just enter the issue is or a part of the issue subject in a input field and get an auto completion.
Select the corresponding issue and drag them to the right where all the versions were displayed.
What do you think?
Daniel Felix wrote:
Just enter the issue is or a part of the issue subject in a input field and get an auto completion.
Select the corresponding issue and drag them to the right where all the versions were displayed.
What do you think?
Well that would be wonderful.
Dipan Mehta wrote:
Add related : #488
Done. But not sure if this issue is a duplicate of #488?
Yes indeed - #1936 looks like a duplicate of #488
Dipan Mehta wrote:
Yes indeed - #1936 looks like a duplicate of #488
I close #488 because #1936 has more notes.
Also available in: Atom
PDF