Feature #2624
Repository statistics should honour user-mapping
Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2009-01-30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | SCM | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Resolution: | Duplicate |
Description
at the moment the Repository statistics graphs show different stats for two repository-users that were mapped onto one Redmine-User. It is probably more useful to only show one entry in that case.
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Damien Couderc over 13 years ago
+1
The stats are pretty useless without that ...
#2
Updated by Thorbjørn Hermansen about 13 years ago
++
I found this too; plase fix? And thank you for all the work done on this project :-)
#3
Updated by Derek Montgomery about 13 years ago
Just saw the mapping options and my first check was to see how it affected graphs... so, +1 here too.
Thanks JP!!
#4
Updated by Marlin Forbes about 13 years ago
And another +1 here too. I have 4 entries for myself from a repository I'm using because of accessing it from different hosts. The display only shows my name, not email address. So stats show me as 4 indistinguishable Marlin Forbes's. :)
#5
Updated by Derek Montgomery about 13 years ago
Please?
#6 Updated by Anonymous about 13 years ago
+1
#7
Updated by Guillaume Ayoub over 12 years ago
It seems to be a duplicate of #2065. A patch has been submitted, tests welcome.
#8
Updated by João Machado about 12 years ago
- File merge_users_stats.diff
added
- Status changed from New to Resolved
#9
Updated by Greg Mefford almost 12 years ago
+1 (I'll try to take a look at this patch tonight if I have time)
#10
Updated by Damien Couderc over 11 years ago
Hi all,
I'm using 1.0.2 and I'm unable to see anything fixed here.
Excuse me if I'm wrong but maybe the issue shouldn't be marked resolved until the fix is really in the SCM.
#11
Updated by Mischa The Evil over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to New
Damien Couderc wrote:
I'm using 1.0.2 and I'm unable to see anything fixed here.
Excuse me if I'm wrong but maybe the issue shouldn't be marked resolved until the fix is really in the SCM.
You are right. Thanks for mentioning it!
#12
Updated by Damien Couderc over 11 years ago
The diff provided by João Machado seems to be trivial. Any reason why it did not go into trunk ?
#13
Updated by Daniel Macedo over 11 years ago
Damien Couderc wrote:
The diff provided by João Machado seems to be trivial. Any reason why it did not go into trunk ?
+1
#14
Updated by Ludovic Gasc over 11 years ago
+1
#15
Updated by Dan Clarke over 10 years ago
+1
#16
Updated by Federico Bonelli over 9 years ago
28 jan 2013 here, did it get patched? I'm still experiencing this same behavior
#17 Updated by Anonymous about 9 years ago
I created issue #13487 with an alternate patch for this. I would appreciate if either the patch here or mine could be merged.
#18
Updated by Dipan Mehta about 9 years ago
+1. Very important to have this sorted.
#19
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA about 8 years ago
- Duplicated by Defect #15994: Repository view does not obfuscate author emails added
#20
Updated by Jean-Baptiste Barth over 7 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Duplicate
I close this one as the discussion continues in #13487.