Feature #32764
Make form validation errors more obvious for users
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: |  Go MAEDA | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | UI | |||
| Target version: | 4.2.0 | |||
| Resolution: | Fixed |
Description
Currently, the validation errors are shown only on top of the page:
which makes very hard for the user to find those fields with errors, especially when there are multiple fields (how is in the case of an issue).
What do you think if we make those fields with errors more obvious?
validation_errors.png (198 KB)
highlight_fields.png (180 KB)
0001-Highlight-fields-with-validation-error.patch 
(738 Bytes)
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Marius BALTEANU about 1 year ago
- Description updated (diff)
#2
Updated by Go MAEDA about 1 year ago
Marius BALTEANU wrote:
What do you think if we make those fields with errors more obvious?
+1
It is a very common interface. And the issue form tends to have many fields, so Redmine should definitely have this feature.
#3
Updated by Mischa The Evil about 1 year ago
Marius BALTEANU wrote:
What do you think if we make those fields with errors more obvious?
I think that would be a nice improvement indeed. Though I'm not sure if the field label should be changed too or if the highlighting of the actual field (border) itself is sufficient. We might want to get some feedback on that as some users may have patched/changed the core in such a way that it has custom field styling which may conflict with such a change (however, such shouldn't block a change like proposed here).
#4
Updated by Marius BALTEANU 12 months ago
Here is the patch.
Mischa The Evil wrote:
I think that would be a nice improvement indeed. Though I'm not sure if the field label should be changed too or if the highlighting of the actual field (border) itself is sufficient. We might want to get some feedback on that as some users may have patched/changed the core in such a way that it has custom field styling which may conflict with such a change (however, such shouldn't block a change like proposed here).
Initially, I tried only the field (border), but because all labels are bold, it wasn't obvious enough for me. Anyway, any option works for me.
#7
Updated by Go MAEDA 10 days ago
- Related to Defect #34580: Custom field labels do not contain class "error" when the field value is invalid added