Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #5765

closed

Issue Numbers per Project

Added by Sam Bo over 14 years ago. Updated about 9 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Issues
Target version:
-
Start date:
2010-06-27
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Wont fix

Description

My suggestion would be add issue numbers that are specific to projects and not global. I know there are probably many of us that move from other systems and need to maintain ticket numbers across the transition. Ie, moving 2 projects that both start with issue #1. I'm guessing this would impact many aspects and possibly require not using the auto increment id field of the issues table but adding a new field (number or whatever) to the issue table.


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Feature #282: Ability to specify a project codeClosed

Actions
Related to Redmine - Feature #538: Issue Numbering is note respecting projectsClosed

Actions
Related to Redmine - Feature #1926: Issues identifiersClosedJean-Philippe Lang2008-09-19

Actions
Related to Redmine - Defect #3843: Better issue identifiersClosedJean-Philippe Lang2009-09-10

Actions
Related to Redmine - Feature #3094: Change ticket ID generationClosed2009-04-012013-04-01

Actions
Has duplicate Redmine - Feature #7873: Issue identifierClosed2011-03-15

Actions
Has duplicate Redmine - Feature #8039: Start issues from 1 per projectClosed2011-04-01

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Moritz Voss over 14 years ago

Should be optional at best, IMHO.

Our shop has so many projects, and so many cross-project relations that pop up every now and then, we rely heavily on the opposite - unique ticket numbers, globally.

Actions #2

Updated by Mischa The Evil over 14 years ago

See preceding related issues #282, #538, #1926 and #3843.

I personally don't think that the current implementation should be changed.

Actions #3

Updated by Felix Schäfer over 14 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Resolution set to Wont fix

This has already been discussed and won't be implemented.

Actions #4

Updated by Andriy Lesyuk about 10 years ago

Did this in the plugin (uses the project key, that gets prepended to the issue unmber). "Legacy" issue IDs can be still used.

Actions #5

Updated by Ramiz Raja Chaudhry about 9 years ago

Andriy Lesyuk wrote:

Did this in the plugin (uses the project key, that gets prepended to the issue unmber). "Legacy" issue IDs can be still used.

This plugin is highly unstable, I have used this plugin to one of the redmine(2.6) project and after removing so many bugs, it still has many. I would suggest to not to use this plugin at all.

Actions #6

Updated by Andriy Lesyuk about 9 years ago

Ramiz Raja Chaudhry wrote:

This plugin is highly unstable, I have used this plugin to one of the redmine(2.6) project and after removing so many bugs, it still has many. I would suggest to not to use this plugin at all.

You have bugs after removing it or when it is installed?.. Also, you should not use it for 2.6 as it does not support this version (the home page lists versions supported).

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF