Defect #6523
open
Sort order doesn't treat german "umlaute" correct in user listing
Added by Frank Helk over 13 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.
0%
Description
Sorting of object seems to treat german special characters not correct.
Ä should range equal to ae, Ö should range equal to oe, Ü should range equal to ue and ß should range equal to ss.
Seems to be correct when user groups are listed, but broken when Users are listed (at least in groups), where ä,ö,ü and ß range behind z
Updated by Daniel Felix over 11 years ago
- Due date set to 2013-01-22
- Status changed from New to Needs feedback
Well, any news on this? I tried this, but it seems to work on my system.
If there is no feedback on this issue, I'm going to close this next week.
Updated by Frank Helk about 11 years ago
Sorry for being somewhat late ....
I'm somewhat overwhelmed with project work, so our redmine incarnation is not very up-to-date - means I'm at 1.3.1stable here.
I've checked on that anyhow, because it's way more current than the version the problem was reported for (1.0.1). The problem ist definitely there on V1.3.1.
I've opened a group's user list, and found the following sort order (names shortened ...)
Fi... Ge... Gi... Gl... Go... Gr... Gä... (wrong position) Gü... (wrong position) Ha... He... Hi... Ho... Hä... (wrong position) Ig...
Could anybody from DE locale please check that with the current version ?
Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA about 11 years ago
Filou Centrinov wrote:
In v2.2 everything is fine.
Ruby 1.8 or 1.9?
Updated by Filou Centrinov about 11 years ago
Ruby 1.8 or 1.9?
ruby 1.9.1
Update: Only in the admin settings the group list is sorted correctly. When I want to add a group as a member to a project (in the project settings) the list is not correct!
Hint: In the german language the sorting of ä is equal to a. (ö=o, ü=u)
Updated by Daniel Felix about 11 years ago
- Target version set to 2.4.0
Any news on this issue?
Any idea how to fix this problem? Which coalition is used in the database table?
Maybe this could be a 2.4 goal.
Updated by Gabriel Mazetto almost 11 years ago
This problem is somehow "unfixable", as there is no silver bullet.
By choosing one collation, you will "fix" it for one language, but break it for another one, because that's what collations are made for, to solve the problem of ordering characters.
Maybe the best sollution could be to high awareness of collations and help new users figure out what is the correct one they should use to support their languages.
Here are some documentations that could give more info on the problem:
Updated by Gabriel Mazetto almost 11 years ago
- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5526169/what-is-the-best-mysql-collation-for-german-language
- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2344118/utf-8-general-bin-unicode
- http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/charset-collation-effect.html
(sorry, had to split it in two answers as redmine "flaged" as a possible spam)
Updated by Etienne Massip almost 11 years ago
Gabriel Mazetto wrote:
This problem is somehow "unfixable", as there is no silver bullet.
By choosing one collation, you will "fix" it for one language, but break it for another one, because that's what collations are made for, to solve the problem of ordering characters.
Redmine/Rails could handle ORDER BY .. COLLATE part depending on user profile?
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 10 years ago
The problem seems to be more with ruby #sort:
Using the database sort (MySQL):
irb(main):002:0> Group.sorted.all.map(&:name)
←[1m←[35mGroup Load (0.0ms)←[0m SELECT `users`.* FROM `users` WHERE `users`.`
type` IN ('Group') ORDER BY users.lastname ASC
=> ["Gä", "Gr", "Gü"]
Using ruby #sort (1.9.3):
irb(main):003:0> Group.all.map(&:name).sort
←[1m←[36mGroup Load (0.0ms)←[0m ←[1mSELECT `users`.* FROM `users` WHERE `user
s`.`type` IN ('Group')←[0m
=> ["Gr", "Gä", "Gü"]
Filou Centrinov wrote:
Update: Only in the admin settings the group list is sorted correctly.
Because it uses a SQL ORDER
When I want to add a group as a member to a project (in the project settings) the list is not correct!
In 2.2, groups are sorted using ruby #sort for when adding a project member. Since 2.3, it uses a SQL ORDER statement so it should be OK now.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 10 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.0 to Candidate for next major release
2.4 feature freeze
Updated by Rafał Lisowski almost 9 years ago
I had the same problem on edit/add issue page and https://github.com/twitter/twitter-cldr-rb#sorting-collation help me.
I added this twitter_cldr gem to Gemfile.local and modify
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
--- a/app/helpers/application_helper.rb
+++ b/app/helpers/application_helper.rb
@@ -392,7 +392,10 @@ module ApplicationHelper
s << content_tag('option', "<< #{l(:label_author)} >>", :value => author.id)
end
groups = ''
- collection.sort.each do |element|
+ lang = TwitterCldr.supported_locale?(current_language) ? current_language : :en
+ collator = TwitterCldr::Collation::Collator.new(lang)
+ collection.sort do |a, b|
+ collator.compare(a.name, b.name)
+ end.each do |element|
selected_attribute = ' selected="selected"' if option_value_selected?(element, selected) || element.id.to_s == selected
(element.is_a?(Group) ? groups : s) << %(<option value="#{element.id}"#{selected_attribute}>#{h element.name}</option>)
end