Feature #6881
open
Version numbering sort
0%
Description
This is my first bug report im not sure if it is a bug but
0.1 0.2
1.0 1.1
Works good but if you do
0.1 0.2 0.11
It be a bit wrong
/ Slaktarn
Files
Related issues
Updated by John Yani about 14 years ago
I think, you should use
0.01 0.02 0.11 0.20
If you want to change the version number from 0.1 to 0.01, I think, you can do that.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 14 years ago
- Tracker changed from Defect to Feature
- Subject changed from Roadmap, Version Error to Version numbering sort
- Priority changed from High to Normal
Versions are sorted by date then by name (alphabetically), so what you describe is not a defect (1.1 < 1.10 < 1.2 is alphabetically correct).
What you expect is some kind of version numbering sort when names looks like x.y where x and y are integers.
Updated by SwedishMatch TimerWolf about 14 years ago
Are it not any way to first sort them after numbering?
/ Slaktarn
Updated by SwedishMatch TimerWolf about 14 years ago
SwedishMatch TimerWolf wrote:
Are it not any way to first sort them after numbering?
/ Slaktarn
Or atlest if that not possibel first store after date and not name to get it right anyways it culd be a workaround
Updated by Ebrahim Mohammadi over 13 years ago
I don't know of any versioning scheme in which "1.10" is smaller than "1.2". I think this issue deserves a higher priority, or even it could be set as a "defect".
Updated by Go MAEDA almost 6 years ago
- Has duplicate Defect #28035: Order of versions is not correctly ordered added
Updated by Frank Schwarz over 3 years ago
I guess the reason for this ticket not being solved within 10 years is the fact that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
However, if you would refactor the code for the internal version sort to be extensible, I could help myself with a plugin.