Version numbering sort
This is my first bug report im not sure if it is a bug but
Works good but if you do
0.1 0.2 0.11
It be a bit wrong
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 13 years ago
- Tracker changed from Defect to Feature
- Subject changed from Roadmap, Version Error to Version numbering sort
- Priority changed from High to Normal
Versions are sorted by date then by name (alphabetically), so what you describe is not a defect (1.1 < 1.10 < 1.2 is alphabetically correct).
What you expect is some kind of version numbering sort when names looks like x.y where x and y are integers.
Updated by Frank Schwarz over 2 years ago
I guess the reason for this ticket not being solved within 10 years is the fact that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
However, if you would refactor the code for the internal version sort to be extensible, I could help myself with a plugin.