Feature #35073
closedEscape values in LIKE statements to prevent injection of placeholders (_ or %)
0%
Description
While not technically a security risk, LIKE queries with lots of placeholders can result in high database load, very slow query execution and therefore are a possible vector for denial of service attacks. Further, escaping the wildcard characters in actual query values now allows to actually search for values containing these characters.
The attached patches, which have been extracted from Planio are:
- The first patch removes '%' signs from query strings used in the search test case. These did not matter until now since they just resulted in queries like
field LIKE '%%value%%'
, but now would be looking for a value with literal percent signs. Tests pass before and after that change. - Patches 2-4 add
sanitize_sql_like
calls to the various places where we currrently generate sql LIKE statements. Corresponding tests are included. - The last patch is just a cosmetic change that replaces a
.send
with a direct call since the called method is now public.
Files
Related issues
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
- Related to Feature #13347: Filtering by issue subject with wildcard added
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
- Related to Defect #19786: '%' and '_' are treated as SQL wildcards in issue filter added
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
I actually find the current behavior useful. For example, when I search for photos using the "File" filter, I use the query string "dsc%.jpg".
If Redmine prohibits the inclusion of "_" or "%" in the query string, then I want some alternative.
Updated by Jens Krämer over 3 years ago
- File 0001-tokenize-query-strings-for-Issue.like-and-Query-sql_.patch 0001-tokenize-query-strings-for-Issue.like-and-Query-sql_.patch added
In general I believe these SQL wild cards are nowhere documented in the Redmine context (please correct me if I'm wrong), and therefore more or less a 'hidden feature' for power users who are familiar with SQL. Given the potential of abuse (and the current inability to search for terms that actually contain these wildcards), I still believe it is the right way to not expose such a low level database feature.
However I get your point and in fact I am right now revisiting this because some Planio power users do miss the SQL wild cards as well :)
The alternative I am experimenting with right now is breaking up the user's query string into tokens like the global search does, and use these to build a query with multiple LIKE
clauses that are combined with AND
. I'm attaching a preliminary patch that implements this for the Issue.like
scope (used by the autocompleter) and the Query#sql_contains
method (which should cover all query filters). Do you think that's a viable approach?
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
Jens Krämer wrote:
In general I believe these SQL wild cards are nowhere documented in the Redmine context (please correct me if I'm wrong), and therefore more or less a 'hidden feature' for power users who are familiar with SQL. Given the potential of abuse (and the current inability to search for terms that actually contain these wildcards), I still believe it is the right way to not expose such a low level database feature.
I agree with you. Actually, I opened #13347 that reports about it 6 years ago.
The alternative I am experimenting with right now is breaking up the user's query string into tokens like the global search does, and use these to build a query with multiple
LIKE
clauses that are combined withAND
. I'm attaching a preliminary patch that implements this for theIssue.like
scope (used by the autocompleter) and theQuery#sql_contains
method (which should cover all query filters). Do you think that's a viable approach?
I tried out the patch and found it is really useful. I think it is a great improvement to be able to do OR searches with multiple keywords, which is currently not possible with the current filters. Although it is a breaking change, it is worth more than that.
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
- Target version set to Candidate for next major release
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
- Blocks Feature #35764: Multiple search terms in the "contains" operator of text filters added
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU over 3 years ago
- Target version changed from Candidate for next major release to 5.0.0
Updated by Go MAEDA over 3 years ago
Jens Krämer wrote:
The alternative I am experimenting with right now is breaking up the user's query string into tokens like the global search does, and use these to build a query with multiple
LIKE
clauses that are combined withAND
. I'm attaching a preliminary patch that implements this for theIssue.like
scope (used by the autocompleter) and theQuery#sql_contains
method (which should cover all query filters). Do you think that's a viable approach?
I have extracted attachment:0001-tokenize-query-strings-for-Issue.like-and-Query-sql_.patch to a separete issue #35764, because it adds a new feature but others fix undesirable behavior as described in the subject.
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Assignee set to Marius BĂLTEANU
All five patches committed, thanks.
Updated by Go MAEDA about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Reopened
After applying the patch, some tests fail when the backend database is SQLite. I will post a fix soon.
Updated by Go MAEDA about 3 years ago
- File 35073-sqlite-fix.patch 35073-sqlite-fix.patch added
Go MAEDA wrote:
After applying the patch, some tests fail when the backend database is SQLite. I will post a fix soon.
I am attaching a patch that fixes the issue. There is no default escape character in SQLite, so it must be specified explicitly using an ESCAPE clause.
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU about 3 years ago
Go MAEDA wrote:
Go MAEDA wrote:
After applying the patch, some tests fail when the backend database is SQLite. I will post a fix soon.
I am attaching a patch that fixes the issue. There is no default escape character in SQLite, so it must be specified explicitly using an ESCAPE clause.
I don't have a local environment with SQLite to test it. Is it ok to commit the patch directly?
Updated by Go MAEDA about 3 years ago
- File 35073-sqlite-fix.patch 35073-sqlite-fix.patch added
Updated the fix for SQLite. The previous patch fails when the database is MS SQL Server.
Marius BALTEANU wrote:
I don't have a local environment with SQLite to test it. Is it ok to commit the patch directly?
Yes, it can be committed as is. The new patch was tested with all supported databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and MS SQL Server).
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU about 3 years ago
- Subject changed from escape values in LIKE statements to prevent injection of placeholders (_ or %) to Escape values in LIKE statements to prevent injection of placeholders (_ or %)
- Status changed from Reopened to Closed
All tests passed now.