Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #3819

closed

Issue Tracking box on the project overview isn't clear

Added by Alex Last about 15 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Projects
Target version:
-
Start date:
2009-09-04
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Fixed

Description

anyways, here's the problem. this is "Issue tracking" panel of the Project Overview I see:

  • Bug: 28 open on 30
  • Task: 181 open on 226
  • Discussion: 3 open on 3

what is this? what does it mean "... open on..." ?
this should be more clear and obvious.

Actions #1

Updated by Alex Last about 15 years ago

dammit, hit enter before finished entering all the info. how can I change the summary now?

anyways, here's the problem. this is "Issue tracking" panel I see:

  • Bug: 28 open on 30
  • Task: 181 open on 226
  • Discussion: 3 open on 3

what is this? what does it mean "... open on..." ?
this should be more clear and obvious.

Actions #2

Updated by Stavros Korokithakis about 15 years ago

"28 of 30 open" would be clearer indeed.

Actions #3

Updated by Eric Davis about 15 years ago

  • Subject changed from "issue tracking" to Issue Tracking box on the project overview isn't clear

alexey skor:

Good eye, that is a bit confusing. On the latest version it reads a bit better but still looks off:

Issue tracking

  • Feature: 36 open / 71
  • Task: 0 open / 7
  • Bug: 7 open / 28
  • Support: 0 open / 6

Source: https://projects.littlestreamsoftware.com/projects/redmine-timesheet

I think "x of y open" would make the most sense. What do you think?

(P.S. I also updated the subject and description for you.)

Actions #4

Updated by XXX XXX about 15 years ago

I agree with you completely!

Actions #5

Updated by Dipan Mehta over 11 years ago

This is fully implemented now. Or at least it makes sense now!

Should this issue be closed?

Actions #6

Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 11 years ago

  • Category set to Projects
Actions #7

Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 11 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Needs feedback
Actions #8

Updated by Go MAEDA almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs feedback to Closed
  • Resolution set to Fixed

Dipan Mehta wrote:

This is fully implemented now. Or at least it makes sense now!

Should this issue be closed?

Indeed. I close this issue.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF