Feature #26575
closedAdd update info at the bottom of the wiki page
0%
Description
Files
Updated by Go MAEDA over 7 years ago
- Category set to Wiki
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
- Target version set to 4.0.0
Implemented in r16905.
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU over 7 years ago
- File 26575_add_links_to_user_and_to_date.patch 26575_add_links_to_user_and_to_date.patch added
- File before.png before.png added
- File after.png after.png added
I propose to add some links to the user name and date (for consistency with other screens).
Before:
After:
Updated by Go MAEDA over 7 years ago
Marius BALTEANU wrote:
I propose to add some links to the user name and date (for consistency with other screens).
+1time_tag
is really needed to know detailed updated time.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Fixed
Patch committed, thanks.
Updated by Alexander Ryabinovskiy over 6 years ago
- File redmine_wiki_version.png redmine_wiki_version.png added
Hello.
I am trying to translate "label_x_revisions" in .yml and I have a question.
Why did you called this label "revisions" (like in "Repository" module) but not "versions" (like in wiki history) ?
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Reopened to Closed
Wiki history now uses "Revisions" only.
Updated by Go MAEDA over 6 years ago
- File redmine-3_4@2x.png redmine-3_4@2x.png added
- File redmine-4_0-without-icon@2x.png redmine-4_0-without-icon@2x.png added
- File redmine-4_0-with-icon@2x.png redmine-4_0-with-icon@2x.png added
- Status changed from Closed to Reopened
I think that showing the familiar "history" icon is better. If there is the icon, users can find the important link easily and can understand that the "X revisions" is the link that they used to call "History" link.
Without the icon, users may not be able to find this feature and misunderstand that "History" has been removed.
Index: app/views/wiki/show.html.erb
===================================================================
--- app/views/wiki/show.html.erb (revision 17516)
+++ app/views/wiki/show.html.erb (working copy)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
<% if User.current.allowed_to?(:view_wiki_edits, @project) %>
<p class="wiki-update-info">
<%= wiki_content_update_info(@content) %>
- · <%= link_to l(:label_x_revisions, :count => @content.version), {:action => 'history', :id => @page.title} %>
+ · <%= link_to l(:label_x_revisions, :count => @content.version), {:action => 'history', :id => @page.title}, {:class => 'icon icon-history'} %>
</p>
<% end %>
Redmine 3.4:
We had an icon beside the History link.
The current trunk (Redmine 3.4.6.devel.17516):
"History" was changed to "X revisions" and the icon was removed.
The current trunk with the proposing patch:
Adding the icon is intuitive and consistent with older versions.
Updated by Erik E over 6 years ago
Would it be confusing/a problem to keep the "History" button above? I think the information below is a great addition, but the button on the top would allow easy access to the history (without the need to scroll down)- and all other "control" elements are there, too.
As an imho: In that case I'd drop the icon below, I think it looks more elegant. But I am not an UI/UX expert ;-)
Updated by Vasili Korol about 6 years ago
I am +1 for keeping the "History" link at the top, in addition to the new controls at the bottom.
Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 6 years ago
- Status changed from Reopened to Closed
History link restored at the top of the page.