Feature #28947
Show the existing attachments on the wiki editing page
Status: | New | Start date: | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | Wiki | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Resolution: |
Description
When attaching a new file on the wiki edit page, the file name is displayed.
However, existing attachments are not displayed.
This information is useful for displaying existing attachments as inline images (!file_name.png!).
ex)
History
#1
Updated by Tomomi Yuzuriha almost 4 years ago
+1 for Mizuki ISHIKAWA’s idea!
I wrote a patch to implement this feature.
#2
Updated by Takenori TAKAKI almost 4 years ago
+1
I would be very happy if I could see the feature in Redmine.
#3
Updated by Marius BALTEANU almost 4 years ago
Nice feature.
I think that it'll be useful also to add the "Delete multiple attachments with one action" feature implemented for issues in #13072, but we can do it in another ticket.
#4
Updated by Go MAEDA almost 4 years ago
Tomomi Yuzuriha wrote:
I wrote a patch to implement this feature.
Thank you for submitting the patch.
Would you explain why the patch disables 'Delete' button on wiki#edit page?
#5
Updated by Tomomi Yuzuriha almost 4 years ago
Go MAEDA wrote:
Would you explain why the patch disables 'Delete' button on wiki#edit page?
If you delete a file during editing on wiki#edit page, its contents will be discarded.
Therefore, I added deletable options so that 'Delete' button is not displayed.
#6
Updated by Go MAEDA almost 4 years ago
Tomomi Yuzuriha wrote:
Go MAEDA wrote:
Would you explain why the patch disables 'Delete' button on wiki#edit page?
If you delete a file during editing on wiki#edit page, its contents will be discarded.
Therefore, I added deletable options so that 'Delete' button is not displayed.
Thank you for the clarification. I found a very similar issue #28953. I think we should resolve it before moving this issue forward.
#7
Updated by Mizuki ISHIKAWA almost 4 years ago
Thank you for all the work for this feature.
I think that if #16410 were implemented that feature could meet my needs.