Project

General

Profile

Actions

Defect #6564

closed

Remove IssuePriorityCustomFields?

Added by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago. Updated about 14 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
UI
Target version:
-
Start date:
2010-10-04
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Resolution:
Wont fix
Affected version:

Description

As far as I can see, the IssuePriorityCustomFields aren't used for anything (yet or anymore, I don't know), would anyone mind at least taking them out of the UI?


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Feature #4077: Custom fields and overrides on EnumerationsClosedEric Davis2009-10-21

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Terence Mill about 14 years ago

Sorry, Felix.. i forgot to add a report as promised.

Actions #2

Updated by Eric Davis about 14 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • Resolution set to Wont fix

I want to leave them. Even if there isn't any code in the Redmine core using them, other plugins or themes can use them.

I have one idea that might take advantage of them (e.g. css color custom field, instead of hard coding the css to use an issue priority's position)

Actions #3

Updated by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago

Noted, though there have been some queries in the last few days about them, maybe a short FAQ entry or something?

Actions #4

Updated by Mischa The Evil about 14 years ago

Felix Schäfer wrote:

Noted, though there have been some queries in the last few days about them, maybe a short FAQ entry or something?

I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.

Actions #5

Updated by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago

Mischa The Evil wrote:

I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.

I've removed the mention of the "Required" field, as it doesn't do anything. That's enough for me for the moment, I consider the matter closed, we can bring this up again as need arises.

Actions #6

Updated by Mischa The Evil about 14 years ago

Felix Schäfer wrote:

Mischa The Evil wrote:

I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.

I've removed the mention of the "Required" field, as it doesn't do anything. [...]

I did the same for GroupCustomFields & DocumentCategoryCustomFields since their status is the same as IssuePriorityCustomFields.

Matter closed... ;)

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF