Defect #6564
closed
Remove IssuePriorityCustomFields?
Added by Felix Schäfer about 14 years ago.
Updated about 14 years ago.
Description
As far as I can see, the IssuePriorityCustomFields aren't used for anything (yet or anymore, I don't know), would anyone mind at least taking them out of the UI?
Sorry, Felix.. i forgot to add a report as promised.
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to Wont fix
I want to leave them. Even if there isn't any code in the Redmine core using them, other plugins or themes can use them.
I have one idea that might take advantage of them (e.g. css color custom field, instead of hard coding the css to use an issue priority's position)
Noted, though there have been some queries in the last few days about them, maybe a short FAQ entry or something?
Felix Schäfer wrote:
Noted, though there have been some queries in the last few days about them, maybe a short FAQ entry or something?
I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.
Mischa The Evil wrote:
I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.
I've removed the mention of the "Required" field, as it doesn't do anything. That's enough for me for the moment, I consider the matter closed, we can bring this up again as need arises.
Felix Schäfer wrote:
Mischa The Evil wrote:
I've extended RedmineCustomFields and included this info. Please extend that wiki-page if the current documentation about the custom fields isn't sufficient/complete/correct.
I've removed the mention of the "Required" field, as it doesn't do anything. [...]
I did the same for GroupCustomFields
& DocumentCategoryCustomFields
since their status is the same as IssuePriorityCustomFields
.
Matter closed... ;)
Also available in: Atom
PDF