Feature #13099
Issue Summary: add statistics about issues without assignee, version or category
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: |  Go MAEDA | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | Issues | |||
| Target version: | 5.0.0 | |||
| Resolution: | Fixed |
Description
Is it possible to add information/statistics in the issue summary about the issues without an Assignee/Version/Category?
2013-02-08_09h41_07.png - printscreen issue summary (9.52 KB)
2013-02-08_09h49_50.png - printscreen drilldown category (7.14 KB)
13099.patch 
(6.26 KB)
13099-v2.patch
(6.36 KB)
Related issues
Associated revisions
Issue Summary: add statistics about issues without assignee, version or category (#13099).
Patch by Takenori TAKAKI.
History
#1
Updated by Mischa The Evil over 9 years ago
This was once part of request #1671.
#2
Updated by Daniel Felix over 9 years ago
This would be definitly nice!
+1 from me.
I'm currently searching for plugins which give a good statistic about project informations. But the most plugins, which are available are broken since their support dropped 1-2 years ago. Redmine should set more interest on this, since a graphic/diagram is in the most cases better than a long tablelisting.
#3
Updated by Jan Niggemann (redmine.org team member) over 9 years ago
+1 from me, too
@Daniel: http://www.redmine.org/plugins/monitoring-controlling?
#4
Updated by Daniel Felix over 9 years ago
Jan Niggemann wrote:
@Daniel: http://www.redmine.org/plugins/monitoring-controlling?
Yep, but this seems to be broken. Most of it works pretty well, but the pie-charts seem to lose their function.
But this is more likely a core functionality for a project management software. Such a functionality should be extendable by plugins, but not just defined by those. :-)
#5
Updated by Jan Niggemann (redmine.org team member) over 9 years ago
@Daniel: Let's continue this per Mail...
#6
Updated by Wim DePreter over 9 years ago
- File 2013-02-08_09h41_07.png added
- File 2013-02-08_09h49_50.png added
Actually, my demand was only for an extra line in each group (assignee, version, category) on the issue summary page (and drilldown in those groups), f.e.:
Issue summary:
Drilldown category:
#7
Updated by Daniel Felix over 9 years ago
Jan Niggemann wrote:
@Daniel: Let's continue this per Mail...
This was my issue. The plugin worked well. My theme.js has been broken after a jquery upgrade. :-)
But thanks anyway Jan.
#8
Updated by Dipan Mehta over 9 years ago
+1. This would be really nice to have.
#10
Updated by Takenori TAKAKI 12 months ago
+1
I think this feature will give a clearer overview of the status of issues.
#11
Updated by Takenori TAKAKI 12 months ago
I made a patch and attached it.
#12
Updated by Takenori TAKAKI 12 months ago
- File 13099.patch added
#15
Updated by Mischa The Evil 10 months ago
Go MAEDA wrote:
[...] I think internationalized
label_noneshould be used instead of a hard-coded string 'none'.
I agree. And besides that, it might be better to place the 'none' line at the top of the list instead of the bottom (like is visible for the category section in the screenshots attached to issue #1671).
Otherwise I think this could be a good improvement of these views.
#16
Updated by Takenori TAKAKI 10 months ago
- File 13099-v2.patch added
Go MAEDA wrote:
Thank you for posting the patch but I found that the string 'none' is hard-coded. I think internationalized
label_noneshould be used instead of a hard-coded string 'none'.
Thanks for pointing this out, Maeda.
I've attached a patch that improves the hard-cord of 'none'.
#17
Updated by Go MAEDA 7 months ago
- Target version changed from Candidate for next major release to 5.0.0
Setting the target version to 5.0.0.
Mischa The Evil wrote:
I agree. And besides that, it might be better to place the 'none' line at the top of the list instead of the bottom (like is visible for the category section in the screenshots attached to issue #1671).
Currently, the 'none' line on the version page is placed at the bottom. So, for the sake of UI consistency, I think it is better to place it at the bottom also on the summary page for now.