Patch #5535
openAssigned to issuelist filter: added <nobody> value
Added by Radek Antoniuk over 14 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.
0%
Description
the filter in the issue list should list <nobody> as well, to make it possible to filter out issues that are assigned to user X OR not assigned at all
Files
Ability_to_use_nobody_in_Assigned_to_field_filter.patch (1.42 KB) Ability_to_use_nobody_in_Assigned_to_field_filter.patch | Vitaly Klimov, 2010-07-09 09:34 |
Related issues
Updated by Vitaly Klimov over 14 years ago
- File Ability_to_use_nobody_in_Assigned_to_field_filter.patch Ability_to_use_nobody_in_Assigned_to_field_filter.patch added
- Assignee set to Jean-Philippe Lang
I have created quick patch to query.rb to fix this issue, please find it attached. Please note, that i tried to keep modifications tiny, so 'author_id' field affected as well.
Updated by Nikolay Kotlyarov over 14 years ago
+1
now you can not combine "asssigned to nobody" filter with "assigned to me"
Updated by Nikolay Kotlyarov over 14 years ago
Vitaly Klimov wrote:
'author_id' field affected as well.
Can you explain how was it affected please?
Updated by Jean-Baptiste Barth over 14 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Jean-Philippe Lang)
Nikolay Kotlyarov wrote:
Can you explain how was it affected please?
It's "affected" since author and assignee use the same list of possible values. But it's not the correct behavior, since author cannot be none, I think it would lead to an other defect :)
I'd prefer a generic solution which would consist in having a "<< none >>" option in some fields : assigned to, target version, category, etc. But only when it makes sense.
Updated by Maxim Krušina over 13 years ago
Please can be this functionality merged into trunk?
Updated by Mischa The Evil almost 13 years ago
- Subject changed from assigned to nobody filter to Assigned to issuelist filter: added <nobody> value
Updated by Radek Antoniuk almost 13 years ago
nice reaction time...
it would be also great to have an "auto-assign" feature without doing categories...
Updated by Hashem Nasarat over 6 years ago
Wished I had this feature today! What can we do to pick this up again?
Updated by Go MAEDA over 6 years ago
- Has duplicate Feature #28924: Issues filter: Adding a <<Nobody>> special entry to the user list added
Updated by Marco Shima about 6 years ago
+2 At least two users at our company wish this feature. This ticket was created 8 years ago, a solution seems to be attached, so maybe priority should be reconsidered?
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU about 6 years ago
Which will be the difference between "Assignee None" and "Assignee Is <nobody>"?
Updated by Bernhard Rohloff about 6 years ago
Marius BALTEANU wrote:
Which will be the difference between "Assignee None" and "Assignee Is <nobody>"?
I think the difference is that with <nobody> you can achieve a kind of OR combination.
Assigned to somebody OR nobody...
I also can't imagine a useful situation for that but there seem to be one.
Perhaps someone of the folks who back this feature could explain its specific use case.
Updated by Radek Antoniuk about 6 years ago
wow, 8 years, good that I'm still alive :-) The difference is already explained in the description of the ticket.
The usecase I don't remember right now, sorry. I guess one could be: "I want to see issues assigned to me (that I'm working on) + the queue (so I can see what's not been picked up yet and I could pick up)"
Updated by Marius BĂLTEANU about 6 years ago
Radek Antoniuk wrote:
wow, 8 years, good that I'm still alive :-) The difference is already explained in the description of the ticket.
The usecase I don't remember right now, sorry. I guess one could be: "I want to see issues assigned to me (that I'm working on) + the queue (so I can see what's not been picked up yet and I could pick up)"
Got it, thanks.