Feature #1040

Global wiki

Added by Carl Nygard over 13 years ago. Updated 7 months ago.

Status:ReopenedStart date:2008-04-10
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:Jean-Philippe Lang% Done:

0%

Category:UI
Target version:-
Resolution:

Description

It would be very helpful to have a global wiki for generalized instructions. The main home page should be the global wiki. The current functionality of news, recent projects, etc. could possibly be implemented with macros() in the wiki, so could be available globally. You could extend this paradigm (idiom, design, convention?) to all the project-specific main pages, and give the managers of each some ability to customize their own main page.

This would be extremely useful in our own situation, where we are using Redmine to manage diverse projects across our engineering group, so we have some need of a "global" wiki area for generalized policy docs, user guides, procedures, etc.

draft-feature-1040.patch Magnifier (24.1 KB) Mizuki ISHIKAWA, 2020-07-30 09:05

draft-feature-1040-r20825.patch Magnifier (23.8 KB) Mizuki ISHIKAWA, 2021-03-19 02:31


Related issues

Related to Redmine - Feature #3048: Central Wiki, FAQ, Documents, etc. for different Projects New 2009-03-25
Related to Redmine - Feature #1982: Extend homepage with forums and admin pages New 2008-10-02
Related to Redmine - Feature #26554: Select Wiki Page as Project Start Page New
Duplicates Redmine - Feature #907: Add global Wiki Closed 2008-03-21
Duplicated by Redmine - Feature #381: general wiki for the whole site Closed
Duplicated by Redmine - Feature #6027: Global wiki and forum Closed 2010-08-03
Duplicated by Redmine - Feature #7642: global wiki interface Closed 2011-02-17

History

#1 Updated by Maxim Krušina over 13 years ago

+1 For now, we're using wiki of one project as global wiki, and I added link to whis Wiki to main top menu, with text "Wiki", but it's just a workaround hack ;)

#2 Updated by Lane Roathe over 13 years ago

+1 as I'm having to create some temporary hacks in order to present company wide information, like programming guidelines, vacation policies, etc. on the Home page. It would be great to have the ability for any module to be "site wide", including ability for existing permission settings, etc. these modules have.

#3 Updated by Tommy Jensen over 13 years ago

+1

#4 Updated by Maximilian Errath over 13 years ago

+1

#5 Updated by mao mao over 13 years ago

+1

#6 Updated by Ronie Henrich over 13 years ago

+1

#9 Updated by Toni Kerschbaum over 13 years ago

+1
Would be great. That way, info that is meant to be company-wide could be published easily, without a need for workarounds.

#10 Updated by Ingmar Heinrich about 13 years ago

+1 from me

#11 Updated by Anonymous about 13 years ago

+1

#13 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang about 13 years ago

  • Target version deleted (0.8)

#14 Updated by Andy Liu about 13 years ago

+1
Would be great.

#15 Updated by Denys Rogovchenko almost 13 years ago

+1000 it would be really great, because a lot of companies hasbig amount projects which are similary... and it so stupid idea to have a lot of independent wiki... Also it good idea to have global file storage, global documents and global forum. I created for that separate project, but it not so good idea because it's not pure project, and it hard to find for people within big amount of real projects in project list... So please make this functionality, users really need it.

#16 Updated by Maxim Krušina almost 13 years ago

+1.3 :)

we're still using menu hack which point's to one project's wiki... no nice solution

#17 Updated by Maxim Krušina almost 13 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed

this is duplicate to #1040

#18 Updated by Maxim Krušina almost 13 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened

ssry, I din't know that linked issue will close both original and duplicate ;(

#19 Updated by Jean-Philippe Lang almost 13 years ago

Maxim: closing the duplicate won't close the original. But closing the original will close the duplicate.

#20 Updated by Mischa The Evil almost 13 years ago

Maxim Krušina wrote:

ssry, I din't know that linked issue will close both original and duplicate ;(

/me ranting out loud while being a bit corny {

He should know better... He should have been known to the automatic-duplicate-closure behaviour of Redmine since it was explained in-depth by J-PL in this forum-thread started by .... Himself...

}

:-)

#21 Updated by Maxim Krušina almost 13 years ago

JPL> Ach so, thnx! ;)
Mischa> There should be no "He should know better" in good app, all must be self-explaining. I just read again forum you sugested, but I think it should be much moe clear how the mechanismus work. All we are heavy Redmine users and even it's a bit confusing now, so some fine-tuning will help!
I bet there will be lot of other users a bit frustrated about this.

In other words: functionality is just OK, but it should be somehow better communicated and self-explaning...

#22 Updated by Jens Berlips almost 13 years ago

+1

#23 Updated by Kirill Ponomarev over 12 years ago

+1 It would be very helpful for me too.

#24 Updated by Paul Rivier over 12 years ago

I would implement this using the newly available unlimited project nesting, and thinking this global wiki as being "the wiki of the root project". Then we can discuss common trees behaviour like inheritance and accumulation. For example, "wiki inheritance" would allow a child project to reference a wikipage of a parent project using only the name of the page, i.e without mentioning the project name. Dynamic resolution would look parents project until it finds the page. I guess this is pretty much what you want for a global wiki

#25 Updated by Kirill Ponomarev over 12 years ago

Paul Rivier wrote:

I would implement this using the newly available unlimited project nesting, ...

It is a good idea!

#26 Updated by Martial SERON about 12 years ago

+1

#27 Updated by Ryan Rangel over 11 years ago

Without this feature we will need to setup a completely seperate Wiki to hold general company information.

+1

#28 Updated by Alex Last over 11 years ago

+1 please

#29 Updated by Željko Trogrlić over 11 years ago

+1

#30 Updated by Hans Schmidt about 11 years ago

+1

#31 Updated by Nowa Zhu about 11 years ago

+1

#32 Updated by Sebastian M. about 11 years ago

+1

#33 Updated by Valery Victorovsky about 11 years ago

any news?

#35 Updated by Attila Antal almost 11 years ago

+1 Good idea! The text could be 'Global Wiki'.

#36 Updated by Florian Breitwieser almost 11 years ago

+ 1. We have several projects which all should have a common Wiki.

#37 Updated by Pawel Orzechowski over 10 years ago

+1

#38 Updated by K. Scott Tripp about 10 years ago

+1. But as Feature #6027 mentions a global forum is just as important.

#39 Updated by Frode Nilsen about 10 years ago

+1

We currently use a "General" project, but global wiki/news/forum would be more elegant.

#40 Updated by Carl Fürstenberg over 9 years ago

Any news? <aol>me too</aol>

#41 Updated by nijee taylor almost 9 years ago

+1

#42 Updated by Dipan Mehta over 8 years ago

+1. This is VERY VERY important. Please have it.

#43 Updated by Dipan Mehta over 8 years ago

Add related - #1982

#45 Updated by wang yan over 7 years ago

+1.

#46 Updated by Alex Alex over 7 years ago

+1

#47 Updated by Benjamin Agger over 7 years ago

+1

#48 Updated by Eduardo Gonzalez over 7 years ago

+1

#50 Updated by Miroslav Zaťko over 6 years ago

+1

#52 Updated by Haifeng Wang almost 6 years ago

+1

#53 Updated by ale dp about 5 years ago

+1

#54 Updated by Ninja Ya almost 5 years ago

+1

#55 Updated by Oleksandr Berg almost 5 years ago

+1

#56 Updated by Ricky Liu over 4 years ago

+1

#57 Updated by jmnote kim over 4 years ago

+1

#58 Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 4 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Feature #13722: setup wiki page with default page)

#59 Updated by Toshi MARUYAMA over 4 years ago

  • Related to Feature #26554: Select Wiki Page as Project Start Page added

#60 Updated by Michael Gerz almost 4 years ago

+1 (is anyone actually counting them?)

#61 Updated by Yasukazu Nagatomi over 3 years ago

+1

#62 Updated by Michał Polanik about 3 years ago

+1

#63 Updated by Mizuki ISHIKAWA over 1 year ago

I've attached a patch that adds a global wiki.
The test is a draft version not yet written.

Any feedback is welcome.
I would be particularly pleased if you could review if you have the proper permissions to view the global wiki.

#64 Updated by Timo Schüring 9 months ago

Hi Mizuki, thank you very much for your effort,

I will try it the next weeks but I have to understand the patch first,
which will take a bit cause I am new to Redmine.

#65 Updated by Mizuki ISHIKAWA 9 months ago

Timo Schüring wrote:

Hi Mizuki, thank you very much for your effort,

I will try it the next weeks but I have to understand the patch first,
which will take a bit cause I am new to Redmine.

Thank you.

Conflict occurred when patching the latest Redmine trunk (r20825).
I will attach the fixed patch.
These patches are developed to be applied to Redmine under development (trunk, r20825) , so it may not be applicable to released Redmine such as Redmine 4.1.

#67 Updated by Timo Schüring 8 months ago

Thank you again, Mizuki-san,

we use Redmine so far on our Synology NAS with an old version based on
a Docker package. So I guess I have to adapt the patch anyway.
And/Or I have to learn how to get the development patch running.

Environment:
Redmine version 3.3.10.stable
Ruby version 2.3.8-p459 (2018-10-18) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
Rails version 4.2.11.1
Environment production
Database adapter Mysql2

#68 Updated by keineahnung 2345 7 months ago

Thank you, Mizuki-san,

I managed to do some trivial changes to make it compilable on Redmine 4.1.1 and 4.1.2: https://gist.github.com/keineahnung2345/4f5eee59079128645cad8aa88016fa77/140e02176ad78bf45ab67dbb8de14c0487cf878f.

But later I found that there are permission problems or redirection path problems on some buttons(new button not showing, internal server error after editing, internal server error after deleting, rename button not working). So I made some changes to make them work as expected: https://gist.github.com/keineahnung2345/4f5eee59079128645cad8aa88016fa77/240d94bce8017f3e52cfce6f9101f39685c91888.

Could you please check the revised code and check if those problems also happen on truck r20825? Thanks.

Also available in: Atom PDF